Learn how Litlyx and Open Analytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 months agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.0.19License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
litlyx/litlyx
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
3 monthsVersion
v0.8.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
openanalytics
Both Litlyx and Open Analytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Litlyx leads in popularity with 1,747 stars vs 642 stars for Open Analytics. The 172% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Litlyx has 116 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Open Analytics is growing faster, adding 52 stars in the last 30 days (+8.8%) against adding 5 stars for Litlyx (+0.3%). Open Analytics is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Open Analytics shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while Litlyx was last updated 11 months ago. This suggests Open Analytics is being more actively maintained.
Litlyx has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Open Analytics which began 3 months ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Litlyx may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Litlyx is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Open Analytics uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Litlyx also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Litlyx and Open Analytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs