Learn how Authgear and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Ory appears to have several advantages over Authgear, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ory significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 13,815 stars compared to 1,949 stars on GitHub. This 7.1x difference suggests Ory has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,175 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 12 hours ago and Ory 9 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Authgear which began 6 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM) while Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authgear and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository