Learn how Authgear and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Ory appears to have several advantages over Authgear, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ory significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 13,593 stars compared to 1,663 stars on GitHub. This 8.2x difference suggests Ory has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,127 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 19 hours ago and Ory 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Authgear which began 6 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM) while Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authgear and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs