Learn how Authgear and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Both Authgear and Ory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ory significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 13,824 stars compared to 1,965 stars on GitHub. This 7.0x difference suggests Ory has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,176 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authgear is growing faster, adding 75 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 68 stars for Ory (+0.5%). Authgear is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 5 days ago and Ory 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Authgear which began 6 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM) while Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authgear and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository