Learn how Authgear and Better Auth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Authgear and Better Auth have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Better Auth significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 27,971 stars compared to 1,664 stars on GitHub. This 16.8x difference suggests Better Auth has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Better Auth has 2,479 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 12 hours ago and Better Auth 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Bash, Python, Golang while Better Auth leverages Next.js, Vue, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Remix, Tanstack Start.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Better Auth which began 2 years ago. This 4.0-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Better Auth uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Authgear's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Authgear provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Better Auth may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs