Learn how Authgear and Logto differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Authgear and Logto have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Logto significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 12,036 stars compared to 1,767 stars on GitHub. This 6.8x difference suggests Logto has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 803 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 1 day ago and Logto 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python, Golang while Logto leverages SCSS.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Logto uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authgear and Logto offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.