Learn how Logto and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Both Logto and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logto and SuperTokens show comparable community engagement with 14,329 and 15,255 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,159 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Logto is growing faster, adding 216 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 12 stars for SuperTokens (+0.1%). Logto is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 2 hours ago and SuperTokens 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses SCSS while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Logto and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository