Learn how Logto and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.45.0License
MPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
logto-io/logto
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v12.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
supertokens-core
Both Logto and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logto and SuperTokens show comparable community engagement with 14,825 and 15,339 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,210 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Logto is growing faster, adding 176 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 11 stars for SuperTokens (+0.1%). Logto is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 1 day ago and SuperTokens 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses SCSS while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 1.5-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Logto and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs