Learn how Hexclave and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

SuperTokens appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,295 stars vs 6,847 stars for Hexclave. The 123% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, SuperTokens has 851 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
SuperTokens is growing faster, adding 50 stars in the last 30 days (+0.3%) against adding 5 stars for Hexclave (+0.1%). SuperTokens is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hexclave last updated 1 hour ago and SuperTokens 27 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hexclave uses Next.js while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 3 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hexclave also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hexclave and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs