Learn how Hexclave and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.0.135Self-hosted
YesRepository
hexclave/hexclave
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v12.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
supertokens-core
Both Hexclave and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,340 stars vs 6,883 stars for Hexclave. The 123% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, SuperTokens has 788 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Hexclave is growing faster, adding 23 stars in the last 30 days (+0.3%) against adding 8 stars for SuperTokens (+0.1%). Hexclave is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hexclave last updated 8 hours ago and SuperTokens 13 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hexclave uses Next.js while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 3 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hexclave also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hexclave and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs