What is the main difference between Cerbos and Hexclave?

Cerbos and Hexclave are both authorization & permissions tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cerbos or Hexclave?

The choice between Cerbos and Hexclave depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cerbos to Hexclave?

Migration between Cerbos and Hexclave is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn More

Learn more

Cerbos vs Hexclave

Learn how Cerbos and Hexclave differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authorization & permissions tools is best for you.

Cerbos

A scalable authorization layer that provides fine-grained access control through externalized policies, enabling secure and flexible permissions management.

Visit Cerbos Read more

Activity score
87/100
Stars
4,502
Forks
199
Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.54.0
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
cerbos/cerbos

Hexclave

Self-hostable platform combining user auth, payments, email, and analytics into modular building blocks that fit around your existing product.

Visit Hexclave Read more

Activity score
90/100
Stars
6,838
Forks
521
Last commit
5 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.0.55
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hexclave/hexclave

Detailed Comparison

Both Cerbos and Hexclave have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Hexclave wins

Community & Popularity

Hexclave leads in popularity with 6,838 stars vs 4,502 stars for Cerbos. The 52% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hexclave has 521 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cerbos last updated 3 days ago and Hexclave 5 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cerbos uses Python, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, Ruby, C# while Hexclave leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js.

Cerbos wins

Project Maturity

Cerbos has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 2 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Cerbos may have more mature features and established processes.

Cerbos wins

Licensing

Cerbos is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authorization & Permissions. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cerbos also focuses on Application Security while Hexclave extends into Authentication & SSO.

Hexclave wins

Hosting & Deployment

Hexclave provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Cerbos may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.