What is the main difference between Cerbos and Hexclave?

Cerbos and Hexclave are both authorization & permissions tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cerbos or Hexclave?

The choice between Cerbos and Hexclave depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cerbos to Hexclave?

Migration between Cerbos and Hexclave is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

Cerbos vs Hexclave

Learn how Cerbos and Hexclave differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authorization & permissions tools is best for you.

Cerbos

A scalable authorization layer that provides fine-grained access control through externalized policies, enabling secure and flexible permissions management.

Visit Cerbos Read more

4,567stars+44(+1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
5 hours ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v0.55.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
cerbos/cerbos

Hexclave

Self-hostable platform combining user auth, payments, email, and analytics into modular building blocks that fit around your existing product.

Visit Hexclave Read more

6,847stars+5(+0.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 hour ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v1.0.113
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hexclave/hexclave

Detailed Comparison

Cerbos appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Cerbos having 4,567 stars and Hexclave having 6,847 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Hexclave has 522 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Cerbos wins

Growth Momentum

Cerbos is growing faster, adding 44 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 5 stars for Hexclave (+0.1%). Cerbos is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cerbos last updated 5 hours ago and Hexclave 1 hour ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cerbos uses Python, Golang, Rust, PHP, Java, Ruby, C# while Hexclave leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js.

Cerbos wins

Project Maturity

Cerbos has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 3 years ago. This 3.0-year head start suggests Cerbos may have more mature features and established processes.

Cerbos wins

Licensing

Cerbos is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authorization & Permissions. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cerbos also focuses on Application Security while Hexclave extends into Authentication & SSO.

Comparable