Learn how Hanko and Hexclave differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v3.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
teamhanko/hanko
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.0.135Self-hosted
YesRepository
hexclave/hexclave
Hanko appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Hanko having 9,060 stars and Hexclave having 6,883 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,023 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hanko and Hexclave are moving at much the same rate, adding 27 stars and adding 23 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 7 hours ago and Hexclave 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Golang, Vue.
Hanko has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 3 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Hanko may have more mature features and established processes.
Hanko is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hexclave extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hanko and Hexclave offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs