Learn how Hanko and Hexclave differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Hanko and Hexclave have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Hanko having 8,984 stars and Hexclave having 6,838 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,012 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 days ago and Hexclave 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Golang, Vue.
Hanko has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 2 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Hanko may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hexclave extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hanko and Hexclave offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.