Learn how Hexclave and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.0.133Self-hosted
YesRepository
hexclave/hexclave
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Both Hexclave and VoidAuth have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hexclave leads in popularity with 6,878 stars vs 2,892 stars for VoidAuth. The 138% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hexclave has 528 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
VoidAuth is growing faster, adding 49 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 16 stars for Hexclave (+0.2%). VoidAuth is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hexclave last updated 3 days ago and VoidAuth 12 hours ago.
Hexclave has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to VoidAuth which began 2 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Hexclave may have more mature features and established processes.
VoidAuth is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hexclave also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hexclave and VoidAuth offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs