Learn how Better Auth and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.7.13License
MITRepository
better-auth
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Both Better Auth and VoidAuth have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Better Auth significantly outpaces VoidAuth in community adoption with 30,463 stars compared to 2,892 stars on GitHub. This 10.5x difference suggests Better Auth has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Better Auth has 3,009 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
VoidAuth is growing faster, adding 49 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 370 stars for Better Auth (+1.2%). VoidAuth is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Better Auth last updated 14 hours ago and VoidAuth 12 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Better Auth beginning 2 years ago and VoidAuth 2 years ago.
Better Auth uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than VoidAuth's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
VoidAuth provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Better Auth may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs