Learn how Better Auth and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.7.25License
MITRepository
better-auth
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.19.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Both Better Auth and VoidAuth have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Better Auth significantly outpaces VoidAuth in community adoption with 30,750 stars compared to 2,923 stars on GitHub. This 10.5x difference suggests Better Auth has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Better Auth has 3,080 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Better Auth and VoidAuth are moving at much the same rate, adding 419 stars and adding 38 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Better Auth last updated 4 hours ago and VoidAuth 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Better Auth uses JSX, Next.js, Vue, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Tanstack Start, Remix while VoidAuth leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Better Auth beginning 2 years ago and VoidAuth 2 years ago.
Better Auth uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than VoidAuth's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
VoidAuth provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Better Auth may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs