Ad
 
Learn more

Better Auth vs Hanko

Learn how Better Auth and Hanko differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Better Auth

Better Auth

A comprehensive authentication framework offering email/password, social sign-on, two-factor auth, and multi-tenant support with full TypeScript integration.
  • Stars


    27,971
  • Forks


    2,479
  • Last commit


    2 hours ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    MIT
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Better Auth
Favicon of Hanko

Hanko

Streamline user authentication with passwordless login, enhancing security and user experience for your web applications.
  • Stars


    8,907
  • Forks


    1,010
  • Last commit


    2 days ago
  • Repository age


    4 years
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Hanko

Detailed Comparison

Both Better Auth and Hanko have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Better Auth wins
Community & Popularity

Better Auth significantly outpaces Hanko in community adoption with 27,971 stars compared to 8,907 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Better Auth has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Better Auth has 2,479 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Better Auth last updated 2 hours ago and Hanko 2 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Better Auth uses SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Remix, Tanstack Start while Hanko leverages Bash, Golang.

Hanko wins
Project Maturity

Hanko has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Better Auth which began 2 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Hanko may have more mature features and established processes.

Better Auth wins
Licensing

Better Auth is licensed under MIT, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Better Auth also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM).

Hanko wins
Hosting & Deployment

Hanko provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Better Auth may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.