What is the main difference between Hanko and Keycloak?

Hanko and Keycloak are both authentication & sso providers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hanko or Keycloak?

The choice between Hanko and Keycloak depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hanko to Keycloak?

Migration between Hanko and Keycloak is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Databuddy – AI-Native Web & Product Analytics you can trust, turn manual dashboards into automated insights.

Start Tracking Free

Learn more

Hanko vs Keycloak

Learn how Hanko and Keycloak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Hanko

Streamline user authentication with passwordless login, enhancing security and user experience for your web applications.

Visit Hanko Read more

Stars
8,907
Forks
1,010
Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
4 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 44 minutes ago.

Keycloak

Comprehensive open source identity management solution offering single sign-on, social login, and fine-grained authorization for applications and services.

Visit Keycloak Read more

Stars
34,047
Forks
8,273
Last commit
14 hours ago
Repository age
13 years
License
Apache-2.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 44 minutes ago.

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Keycloak wins

Community & Popularity

Keycloak significantly outpaces Hanko in community adoption with 34,047 stars compared to 8,907 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Keycloak has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,273 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 days ago and Keycloak 14 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Next.js, Golang, Vue while Keycloak leverages Python, C, Java.

Keycloak wins

Project Maturity

Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 8.8-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.

Keycloak wins

Licensing

Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keycloak extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Hanko wins

Hosting & Deployment

Hanko provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Keycloak may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.