What is the main difference between Hanko and Zitadel?

Hanko and Zitadel are both authentication & sso providers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hanko or Zitadel?

The choice between Hanko and Zitadel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hanko to Zitadel?

Migration between Hanko and Zitadel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Efficient App – Not all Open Source alternatives are equal — Narrow down the best, without the bullsh*t.

Learn More

Learn more

Hanko vs Zitadel

Learn how Hanko and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Hanko

Streamline user authentication with passwordless login, enhancing security and user experience for your web applications.

Visit Hanko Read more

Stars
8,907
Forks
1,010
Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
4 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 22 minutes ago.

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.

Visit Zitadel Read more

Stars
13,621
Forks
1,040
Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 22 minutes ago.

Detailed Comparison

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Zitadel wins

Community & Popularity

Zitadel leads in popularity with 13,621 stars vs 8,907 stars for Hanko. The 53% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,040 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 days ago and Zitadel 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Vue while Zitadel leverages SCSS, Lua.

Zitadel wins

Project Maturity

Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.

Zitadel wins

Licensing

Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable