What is the main difference between Hanko and Zitadel?

Hanko and Zitadel are both authentication & sso providers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hanko or Zitadel?

The choice between Hanko and Zitadel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hanko to Zitadel?

Migration between Hanko and Zitadel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.

Learn More

Hanko vs Zitadel

Learn how Hanko and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Hanko

Open source authentication platform supporting passkeys, 2FA, SSO, and social login. Self-host or use Hanko Cloud, with full control over your data and no lock-in.

Visit Hanko

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.

Visit Zitadel

Detailed Comparison

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Zitadel wins

Community & Popularity

Zitadel leads in popularity with 14,700 stars vs 9,000 stars for Hanko. The 63% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,217 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Zitadel wins

Growth Momentum

Zitadel is growing faster, adding 309 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 32 stars for Hanko (+0.4%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 hours ago and Zitadel 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Vue while Zitadel leverages SCSS, Lua.

Zitadel wins

Project Maturity

Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.

Zitadel wins

Licensing

Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable

Hosting & Deployment

Both Hanko and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

Other tool comparisons to consider

Popular Proprietary Software:

Claude Code Alternatives

12 Spotify Alternatives

2 Notion Alternatives

20 Wispr Flow Alternatives

7 Lovable Alternatives

3 Discord Alternatives

11 CapCut Alternatives

5 n8n Alternatives

6 Cursor Alternatives

8 Microsoft Word Alternatives

5 Adobe Photoshop Alternatives

3 Codex Alternatives

Popular Categories:

Low-Code/No-Code Platforms

37 Project Management Suites

20 AI Agent Platforms

21 PaaS & Deployment Tools

18 Team Chat & Messaging Tools

16 Infrastructure Monitoring Tools

Hanko vs Zitadel

Learn how Hanko and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Hanko

Open source authentication platform supporting passkeys, 2FA, SSO, and social login. Self-host or use Hanko Cloud, with full control over your data and no lock-in.

Visit Hanko

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.

Visit Zitadel

Detailed Comparison

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Zitadel wins

Community & Popularity

Zitadel wins

Growth Momentum

Zitadel is growing faster, adding 309 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 32 stars for Hanko (+0.4%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 hours ago and Zitadel 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Zitadel wins

Project Maturity

Zitadel wins

Licensing

Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable