What is the main difference between Hanko and Zitadel?

Hanko and Zitadel are both authentication & sso providers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hanko or Zitadel?

The choice between Hanko and Zitadel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hanko to Zitadel?

Migration between Hanko and Zitadel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn more

Hanko vs Zitadel

Learn how Hanko and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Hanko

Open source authentication platform supporting passkeys, 2FA, SSO, and social login. Self-host or use Hanko Cloud, with full control over your data and no lock-in.

Visit Hanko Read more

9,052stars+17(+0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
5 years
Version
v3.1.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
teamhanko/hanko

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.

Visit Zitadel Read more

15,484stars+335(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v4.20.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
zitadel/zitadel

Detailed Comparison

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Zitadel wins

Community & Popularity

Zitadel leads in popularity with 15,484 stars vs 9,052 stars for Hanko. The 71% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,411 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Zitadel wins

Growth Momentum

Zitadel is growing faster, adding 335 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 17 stars for Hanko (+0.2%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 days ago and Zitadel 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Vue while Zitadel leverages SCSS, Lua.

Zitadel wins

Project Maturity

Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 5 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable