Learn how SuperTokens and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both SuperTokens and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with SuperTokens having 15,013 stars and Zitadel having 13,621 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,040 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with SuperTokens last updated 9 hours ago and Zitadel 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SuperTokens uses Python, Java while Zitadel leverages Next.js, SCSS, Golang, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with SuperTokens beginning 6 years ago and Zitadel 6 years ago.
Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both SuperTokens and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs