Learn how SuperTokens and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Both SuperTokens and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both SuperTokens and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 15,251 and 14,681 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,216 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with SuperTokens last updated 2 days ago and Zitadel 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SuperTokens uses Python, Java while Zitadel leverages Next.js, SCSS, Golang, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with SuperTokens beginning 7 years ago and Zitadel 6 years ago.
Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both SuperTokens and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
SuperTokensvs
Better AuthActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
