What is the main difference between SuperTokens and Zitadel?

SuperTokens and Zitadel are both authentication & sso providers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: SuperTokens or Zitadel?

The choice between SuperTokens and Zitadel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from SuperTokens to Zitadel?

Migration between SuperTokens and Zitadel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

SuperTokens vs Zitadel

Learn how SuperTokens and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

SuperTokens

Open-source authentication solution offering flexible, self-hosted user management with advanced features and easy integration.

Visit SuperTokens Read more

15,296stars+56(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v12.1.1
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
supertokens/supertokens-core

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.

Visit Zitadel Read more

14,915stars+305(+2.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v4.17.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
zitadel/zitadel

Detailed Comparison

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over SuperTokens, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both SuperTokens and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 15,296 and 14,915 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,260 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Zitadel wins

Growth Momentum

Zitadel is growing faster, adding 305 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 56 stars for SuperTokens (+0.4%). Zitadel is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with SuperTokens last updated 6 hours ago and Zitadel 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SuperTokens uses Python, Java while Zitadel leverages Next.js, SCSS, Golang, Lua.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with SuperTokens beginning 7 years ago and Zitadel 6 years ago.

Zitadel wins

Licensing

Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable