Learn how Permify and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authorization & permissions tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.7.5License
AGPL-3.0Repository
permify/permify
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v4.20.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zitadel/zitadel
Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Permify, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zitadel leads in popularity with 15,484 stars vs 5,968 stars for Permify. The 159% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,411 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zitadel is growing faster, adding 335 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 9 stars for Permify (+0.2%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Permify last updated 8 days ago and Zitadel 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Permify uses Python, Java while Zitadel leverages CSS, Next.js, SCSS, Lua.
Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Permify which began 4 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authorization & Permissions. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authentication & SSO.
Zitadel provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Permify may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.