What is the main difference between Authgear and Zitadel?

Authgear and Zitadel are both authentication & sso providers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Authgear or Zitadel?

The choice between Authgear and Zitadel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Authgear to Zitadel?

Migration between Authgear and Zitadel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – Messaging Infrastructure for Developers. One API for SMS, WhatsApp, and RCS across 190+ countries.

Learn more

Authgear vs Zitadel

Learn how Authgear and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Authgear

Authgear is a managed IAM platform handling authentication, SSO, and user management for B2C and B2B apps, with biometrics, MFA, and zero-trust support.

Visit Authgear Read more

2,137stars+51(+2.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
22.0
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
authgear-server

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.

Visit Zitadel Read more

15,484stars+335(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v4.20.0
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
zitadel/zitadel

Detailed Comparison

Both Authgear and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Zitadel wins

Community & Popularity

Zitadel significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 15,484 stars compared to 2,137 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Zitadel has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,411 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Authgear and Zitadel are moving at much the same rate, adding 51 stars and adding 335 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.4% vs +2.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 2 days ago and Zitadel 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python while Zitadel leverages Next.js, SCSS, Lua.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Authgear beginning 6 years ago and Zitadel 7 years ago.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable