Learn how Authentik and Authgear differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
22.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
authgear-server
Both Authentik and Authgear have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 26,182 stars compared to 2,139 stars on GitHub. This 12.2x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 2,098 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authgear is growing faster, adding 50 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 367 stars for Authentik (+1.4%). Authgear is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 17 hours ago and Authgear 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Rust, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Authentik beginning 7 years ago and Authgear 6 years ago.
Authentik uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Authgear's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Authgear offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs