Learn how Authentik and Authgear differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Authentik and Authgear have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 21,151 stars compared to 1,664 stars on GitHub. This 12.7x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,560 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 31 minutes ago and Authgear 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Rust, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Authentik beginning 6 years ago and Authgear 6 years ago.
Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Authentik's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions while Authgear extends into Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authentik and Authgear offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs