Learn how Authentik and Authgear differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Authgear, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 24,595 stars compared to 1,965 stars on GitHub. This 12.5x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,886 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik is growing faster, adding 2,293 stars in the last 30 days (+10%) against adding 75 stars for Authgear (+4%). Authentik is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 1 hour ago and Authgear 5 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Rust, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Authentik beginning 7 years ago and Authgear 6 years ago.
Authentik uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Authgear's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions while Authgear extends into Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authentik and Authgear offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository