Learn how Authentik and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Pocket ID, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik leads in popularity with 25,173 stars vs 9,028 stars for Pocket ID. The 179% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,963 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik is growing faster, adding 2,663 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 238 stars for Pocket ID (+2.7%). Authentik is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 11 hours ago and Pocket ID 21 hours ago.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Authentik is licensed under MIT while Pocket ID uses BSD-2-Clause. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs