Learn how Logto and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.45.0License
MPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
logto-io/logto
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.19.1License
BSD-2-ClauseSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pocket-id/pocket-id
Both Logto and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Logto leads in popularity with 14,793 stars vs 9,723 stars for Pocket ID. The 52% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,204 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 431 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 156 stars for Logto (+1.1%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 4 hours ago and Pocket ID 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses SCSS while Pocket ID leverages Golang, SvelteKit.
Logto has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Logto may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Logto's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Logto and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs