Learn how Logto and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Logto and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Logto leads in popularity with 14,560 stars vs 9,192 stars for Pocket ID. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,201 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 360 stars in the last 30 days (+4.1%) against adding 204 stars for Logto (+1.4%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 14 hours ago and Pocket ID 13 hours ago.
Logto has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Logto may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Logto's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Logto and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs