Learn how Logto and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.46.0License
MPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
logto-io/logto
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.19.3License
BSD-2-ClauseSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pocket-id/pocket-id
Both Logto and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Logto having 14,936 stars and Pocket ID having 10,317 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,225 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 713 stars in the last 30 days (+7.4%) against adding 249 stars for Logto (+1.7%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 11 hours ago and Pocket ID 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses SCSS while Pocket ID leverages Golang, SvelteKit.
Logto has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Logto may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Logto's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Logto and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs