Learn how Logto and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Logto and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Logto leads in popularity with 14,649 stars vs 9,401 stars for Pocket ID. The 56% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,213 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 298 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 150 stars for Logto (+1%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 5 days ago and Pocket ID 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses SCSS while Pocket ID leverages Golang, SvelteKit.
Logto has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 3.2-year head start suggests Logto may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Logto's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Logto and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs