Learn how Hexclave and Logto differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v1.0.135Self-hosted
YesRepository
hexclave/hexclave
Last 30 days
Last commit
20 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.45.0License
MPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
logto-io/logto
Logto appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Logto leads in popularity with 14,837 stars vs 6,883 stars for Hexclave. The 116% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,212 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Logto is growing faster, adding 189 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 23 stars for Hexclave (+0.3%). Logto is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hexclave last updated 8 hours ago and Logto 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hexclave uses Next.js while Logto leverages SCSS.
Logto has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 3 years ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests Logto may have more mature features and established processes.
Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hexclave also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hexclave and Logto offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs