Learn how Keycloak and Logto differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Keycloak appears to have several advantages over Logto, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Keycloak leads in popularity with 37,276 stars vs 14,665 stars for Logto. The 154% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 9,031 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Keycloak is growing faster, adding 567 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 149 stars for Logto (+1%). Keycloak is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keycloak last updated 11 hours ago and Logto 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keycloak uses Python, C, Java while Logto leverages SCSS.
Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 8.1-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Logto uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keycloak also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Keycloak and Logto offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs