Learn how Keycloak and Logto differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Keycloak appears to have several advantages over Logto, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Keycloak leads in popularity with 36,518 stars vs 14,484 stars for Logto. The 152% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,873 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Keycloak and Logto are moving at much the same rate, adding 579 stars and adding 218 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.6% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keycloak last updated 5 hours ago and Logto 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keycloak uses Python, C, Java while Logto leverages SCSS.
Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 8.1-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Logto uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keycloak also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Keycloak and Logto offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.