Learn how Authentik and Keycloak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Authentik and Keycloak have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Authentik having 25,407 stars and Keycloak having 36,666 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,907 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik is growing faster, adding 1,212 stars in the last 30 days (+5%) against adding 580 stars for Keycloak (+1.6%). Authentik is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 12 hours ago and Keycloak 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Golang, Rust, Django while Keycloak leverages C, Java.
Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Authentik which began 7 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.
Authentik uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Keycloak's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Keycloak offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs