Learn how Authentik and Keycloak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Keycloak appears to have several advantages over Authentik, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Keycloak leads in popularity with 33,983 stars vs 21,082 stars for Authentik. The 61% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,258 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 3 hours ago and Keycloak 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Golang, Rust, Django while Keycloak leverages C, Java.
Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Authentik which began 6 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.
Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Authentik's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Authentik provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Keycloak may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs