Learn how Keycloak and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Keycloak appears to have several advantages over SuperTokens, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Keycloak leads in popularity with 34,047 stars vs 15,015 stars for SuperTokens. The 127% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,273 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keycloak last updated 14 hours ago and SuperTokens 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keycloak uses C.
Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to SuperTokens which began 6 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.
Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keycloak also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
SuperTokens provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Keycloak may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs