Ad
 
Learn More

Cerbos vs Keycloak

Learn how Cerbos and Keycloak differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authorization & permissions tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Cerbos

Cerbos

A scalable authorization layer that provides fine-grained access control through externalized policies, enabling secure and flexible permissions management.
4,565stars+49(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Cerbos
Favicon of Keycloak

Keycloak

Comprehensive open source identity management solution offering single sign-on, social login, and fine-grained authorization for applications and services.
36,518stars+579(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Keycloak

Detailed Comparison

Keycloak appears to have several advantages over Cerbos, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Keycloak wins
Community & Popularity

Keycloak significantly outpaces Cerbos in community adoption with 36,518 stars compared to 4,565 stars on GitHub. This 8.0x difference suggests Keycloak has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,873 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Keycloak wins
Growth Momentum

Keycloak is growing faster, adding 579 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 49 stars for Cerbos (+1.1%). Keycloak is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cerbos last updated 8 hours ago and Keycloak 5 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Python, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cerbos uses Golang, Rust, PHP, Ruby, C# while Keycloak leverages Typescript, JSX, C.

Keycloak wins
Project Maturity

Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Cerbos which began 5 years ago. This 7.8-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authorization & Permissions. However, they also have distinct specializations: Cerbos also focuses on Application Security while Keycloak extends into Authentication & SSO.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Cerbos and Keycloak offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.