Learn how Keycloak and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Keycloak and Ory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Keycloak leads in popularity with 34,047 stars vs 13,593 stars for Ory. The 150% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 8,273 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keycloak last updated 13 hours ago and Ory 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Keycloak uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, C, Java while Ory leverages Golang.
Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Ory which began 8 years ago. This 5.0-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Ory provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Keycloak may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs