Learn how Ory and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 months agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v26.2.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
ory/kratos
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v12.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
supertokens-core
Both Ory and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Ory and SuperTokens show comparable community engagement with 13,946 and 15,339 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,207 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ory and SuperTokens are moving at much the same rate, adding 44 stars and adding 11 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
SuperTokens shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 days ago, while Ory was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests SuperTokens is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ory uses Golang while SuperTokens leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Java.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to SuperTokens which began 7 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Ory and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs