Learn how Ory and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ory and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Ory having 13,856 stars and SuperTokens having 15,296 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,180 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ory and SuperTokens are moving at much the same rate, adding 52 stars and adding 56 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
SuperTokens shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Ory was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests SuperTokens is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ory uses Golang while SuperTokens leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Java.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to SuperTokens which began 7 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Ory and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.