Learn how Ory and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Ory appears to have several advantages over SuperTokens, particularly in maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Ory having 13,593 stars and SuperTokens having 15,015 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,127 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ory last updated 1 day ago and SuperTokens 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ory uses Golang while SuperTokens leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Java.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to SuperTokens which began 6 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Ory and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs