Learn how Hanko and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v3.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
teamhanko/hanko
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v12.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
supertokens-core
Both Hanko and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,339 stars vs 9,052 stars for Hanko. The 69% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,022 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hanko and SuperTokens are moving at much the same rate, adding 17 stars and adding 11 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 days ago and SuperTokens 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Next.js, Golang, Vue while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 5 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Hanko is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Hanko and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs