Learn how Hanko and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

SuperTokens appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,013 stars vs 8,907 stars for Hanko. The 69% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,010 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 days ago and SuperTokens 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Next.js, Golang, Vue while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Hanko and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs