Learn how Hanko and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

SuperTokens appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,296 stars vs 9,017 stars for Hanko. The 70% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,015 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hanko and SuperTokens are moving at much the same rate, adding 25 stars and adding 56 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 3 days ago and SuperTokens 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Next.js, Golang, Vue while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Hanko and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.