Learn how Hanko and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Both Hanko and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,255 stars vs 9,000 stars for Hanko. The 70% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,014 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hanko is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against adding 12 stars for SuperTokens (+0.1%). Hanko is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 hours ago and SuperTokens 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Next.js, Golang, Vue while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Hanko and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository