Learn how Pocket ID and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.19.1License
BSD-2-ClauseSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pocket-id/pocket-id
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v12.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
supertokens-core
Both Pocket ID and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,332 stars vs 9,723 stars for Pocket ID. The 58% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, SuperTokens has 788 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 431 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 9 stars for SuperTokens (+0.1%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Pocket ID last updated 9 hours ago and SuperTokens 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pocket ID uses Golang, SvelteKit while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Pocket ID and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs