Learn how Pocket ID and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Pocket ID and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens leads in popularity with 15,332 stars vs 9,401 stars for Pocket ID. The 63% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, SuperTokens has 836 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 298 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 38 stars for SuperTokens (+0.2%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Pocket ID last updated 12 hours ago and SuperTokens 17 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pocket ID uses Golang, SvelteKit while SuperTokens leverages Python, Java.
SuperTokens has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests SuperTokens may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Pocket ID and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs