Learn how Authgear and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Pocket ID appears to have several advantages over Authgear, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pocket ID significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 9,192 stars compared to 2,047 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Pocket ID has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pocket ID has 310 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 360 stars in the last 30 days (+4.1%) against adding 60 stars for Authgear (+3%). Pocket ID is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 19 hours ago and Pocket ID 13 hours ago.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Authgear's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authgear and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs