Learn how Authgear and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Authgear and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pocket ID significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 9,401 stars compared to 2,094 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Pocket ID has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pocket ID has 318 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Authgear and Pocket ID are moving at much the same rate, adding 70 stars and adding 298 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+3.5% vs +3.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 22 hours ago and Pocket ID 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python while Pocket ID leverages SvelteKit.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Authgear's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Authgear and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs