Learn how Authgear and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Authgear and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pocket ID significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 9,028 stars compared to 2,010 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Pocket ID has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pocket ID has 304 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Authgear is growing faster, adding 94 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 238 stars for Pocket ID (+2.7%). Authgear is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 18 hours ago and Pocket ID 21 hours ago.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Authgear's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authgear and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs