Learn how Authgear and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
22.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
authgear-server
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Authgear appears to have several advantages over VoidAuth, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Authgear having 2,125 stars and VoidAuth having 2,892 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, VoidAuth has 134 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Authgear is growing faster, adding 55 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 49 stars for VoidAuth (+1.7%). Authgear is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 3 days ago and VoidAuth 12 hours ago.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to VoidAuth which began 2 years ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0 while VoidAuth uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Authgear and VoidAuth offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs