Learn how Keycloak and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
26.8.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
keycloak/keycloak
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Both Keycloak and VoidAuth have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Keycloak significantly outpaces VoidAuth in community adoption with 37,517 stars compared to 2,892 stars on GitHub. This 13.0x difference suggests Keycloak has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Keycloak has 9,106 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
VoidAuth is growing faster, adding 49 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 518 stars for Keycloak (+1.4%). VoidAuth is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Keycloak last updated 6 hours ago and VoidAuth 12 hours ago.
Keycloak has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to VoidAuth which began 2 years ago. This 12.0-year head start suggests Keycloak may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 while VoidAuth uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Keycloak also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Keycloak and VoidAuth offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs