Learn how Pocket ID and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.19.3License
BSD-2-ClauseSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pocket-id/pocket-id
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.19.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Pocket ID appears to have several advantages over VoidAuth, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pocket ID significantly outpaces VoidAuth in community adoption with 10,317 stars compared to 2,923 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Pocket ID has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pocket ID has 360 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 713 stars in the last 30 days (+7.4%) against adding 38 stars for VoidAuth (+1.3%). Pocket ID is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Pocket ID last updated 4 hours ago and VoidAuth 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pocket ID uses Bash, JSX, Golang, SvelteKit while VoidAuth leverages SCSS.
Both projects started around the same time, with Pocket ID beginning 2 years ago and VoidAuth 2 years ago.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than VoidAuth's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Pocket ID and VoidAuth offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs