Learn how Pocket ID and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.19.1License
BSD-2-ClauseSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pocket-id/pocket-id
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Pocket ID appears to have several advantages over VoidAuth, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pocket ID significantly outpaces VoidAuth in community adoption with 9,723 stars compared to 2,892 stars on GitHub. This 3.4x difference suggests Pocket ID has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pocket ID has 345 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 431 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 49 stars for VoidAuth (+1.7%). Pocket ID is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Pocket ID last updated 10 hours ago and VoidAuth 12 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Pocket ID beginning 2 years ago and VoidAuth 2 years ago.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than VoidAuth's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Pocket ID and VoidAuth offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs