Learn how Hanko and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v3.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
teamhanko/hanko
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.19.1License
BSD-2-ClauseSelf-hosted
YesRepository
pocket-id/pocket-id
Both Hanko and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hanko and Pocket ID show comparable community engagement with 9,047 and 9,723 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,021 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 431 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 10 stars for Hanko (+0.1%). Pocket ID is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 7 hours ago and Pocket ID 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Next.js, Vue while Pocket ID leverages SvelteKit.
Hanko has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Hanko may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Hanko's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Hanko and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs