Learn how Hanko and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Hanko and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Hanko and Pocket ID show comparable community engagement with 9,034 and 9,401 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,019 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 298 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 14 stars for Hanko (+0.2%). Pocket ID is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 17 hours ago and Pocket ID 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses Next.js, Vue while Pocket ID leverages SvelteKit.
Hanko has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Hanko may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Hanko and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs