Learn how Hanko and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Activity score

Ory appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ory leads in popularity with 13,688 stars vs 8,949 stars for Hanko. The 53% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,151 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 14 hours ago and Ory 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hanko and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.