Learn how Hanko and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Ory appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ory leads in popularity with 13,833 stars vs 9,005 stars for Hanko. The 54% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,178 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hanko and Ory are moving at much the same rate, adding 23 stars and adding 61 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hanko last updated 2 days ago and Ory 22 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hanko uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Vue.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hanko and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.