Learn how Hexclave and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Ory appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ory leads in popularity with 13,888 stars vs 6,862 stars for Hexclave. The 102% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,190 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Hexclave and Ory are moving at much the same rate, adding 20 stars and adding 42 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Hexclave shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while Ory was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Hexclave is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hexclave uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Ory leverages Golang.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 3 years ago. This 5.8-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hexclave and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs