Learn how Logto and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Both Logto and Ory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logto and Ory show comparable community engagement with 14,329 and 13,824 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,176 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Logto is growing faster, adding 216 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 68 stars for Ory (+0.5%). Logto is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 1 hour ago and Ory 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Ory leverages Golang.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Ory uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Logto and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository