Learn how Logto and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Logto and Ory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Logto having 11,940 stars and Ory having 13,593 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,127 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 11 hours ago and Ory 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Ory leverages Golang.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Ory uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Logto and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.