Learn how Logto and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Logto and Ory have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logto and Ory show comparable community engagement with 14,484 and 13,856 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Logto has 1,197 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Logto is growing faster, adding 218 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 52 stars for Ory (+0.4%). Logto is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Logto shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Ory was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Logto is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Logto uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS while Ory leverages Golang.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 3.1-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Ory uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Logto and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.