Learn how Authentik and Ory differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Ory, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik leads in popularity with 24,595 stars vs 13,824 stars for Ory. The 78% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,886 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik is growing faster, adding 2,293 stars in the last 30 days (+10%) against adding 68 stars for Ory (+0.5%). Authentik is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 1 hour ago and Ory 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Python, Rust, Django.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Authentik which began 7 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Authentik uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Ory's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Ory offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository