Learn how Authentik and Hanko differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik leads in popularity with 24,595 stars vs 9,000 stars for Hanko. The 173% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,886 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik is growing faster, adding 2,293 stars in the last 30 days (+10%) against adding 32 stars for Hanko (+0.4%). Authentik is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 1 hour ago and Hanko 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Python, Rust, Django while Hanko leverages Next.js, Vue.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Authentik is licensed under MIT, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Hanko offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository