Learn how Authentik and Hanko differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v3.1.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
teamhanko/hanko
Authentik appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik leads in popularity with 26,183 stars vs 9,052 stars for Hanko. The 189% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 2,096 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik is growing faster, adding 377 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 17 stars for Hanko (+0.2%). Authentik is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 11 hours ago and Hanko 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Python, Rust, Django while Hanko leverages Next.js, Vue.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 5 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Authentik uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hanko's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Hanko offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs