Learn how Authentik and Hanko differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Authentik leads in popularity with 21,151 stars vs 8,907 stars for Hanko. The 137% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,560 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 2 hours ago and Hanko 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Python, Rust, Django while Hanko leverages Next.js, Vue.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 2.2-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Hanko offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs