Ad
Learn more

Authentik vs Zitadel

Learn how Authentik and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

vs

Authentik

authentik is an open-source identity provider that offers self-hosted authentication, authorization, and user management for businesses of all sizes.
26,183stars+377(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    11 hours ago
  • Repository age

    7 years
  • Version

    2026.8.5
  • License

    MIT
  • Self-hosted

    Yes
  • Repository

    authentik
Screenshot of Authentik

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.
15,484stars+335(+2.2%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Zitadel

Detailed Comparison

Both Authentik and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Authentik wins
Community & Popularity

Authentik leads in popularity with 26,183 stars vs 15,484 stars for Zitadel. The 69% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 2,096 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Zitadel wins
Growth Momentum

Zitadel is growing faster, adding 335 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 377 stars for Authentik (+1.5%). Zitadel is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 11 hours ago and Zitadel 1 day ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Python, Rust, Django while Zitadel leverages Next.js, SCSS, Lua.

Comparable
Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Authentik beginning 7 years ago and Zitadel 7 years ago.

Authentik wins
Licensing

Authentik uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Zitadel's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Authentik and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.