Learn how Authentik and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Authentik and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik leads in popularity with 21,151 stars vs 13,621 stars for Zitadel. The 55% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,560 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 2 hours ago and Zitadel 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Python, Rust, Django while Zitadel leverages Next.js, SCSS, Lua.
Both projects started around the same time, with Authentik beginning 6 years ago and Zitadel 6 years ago.
Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Authentik's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs