Learn how Authentik and Better Auth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Better Auth, particularly in maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Authentik having 26,005 stars and Better Auth having 30,365 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Better Auth has 2,988 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authentik and Better Auth are moving at much the same rate, adding 359 stars and adding 352 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 7 hours ago and Better Auth 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Bash, Python, Golang, Rust, Django while Better Auth leverages Next.js, Vue, SvelteKit, Nuxt.js, Tanstack Start, Remix.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Better Auth which began 2 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Authentik provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Better Auth may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs