Ad
 
Learn more

Authentik vs Hexclave

Learn how Authentik and Hexclave differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Authentik

Authentik

authentik is an open-source identity provider that offers self-hosted authentication, authorization, and user management for businesses of all sizes.
  • Activity score


    94/100
  • Stars


    22,456
  • Forks


    1,712
  • Last commit


    5 hours ago
  • Repository age


    7 years
  • Version


    2026.5.6
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    goauthentik/authentik
Screenshot of Authentik
Favicon of Hexclave

Hexclave

Self-hostable platform combining user auth, payments, email, and analytics into modular building blocks that fit around your existing product.
  • Activity score


    90/100
  • Stars


    6,838
  • Forks


    521
  • Last commit


    5 hours ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • Version


    v1.0.55
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    hexclave/hexclave
Screenshot of Hexclave

Detailed Comparison

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.

Authentik wins
Community & Popularity

Authentik significantly outpaces Hexclave in community adoption with 22,456 stars compared to 6,838 stars on GitHub. This 3.3x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,712 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 5 hours ago and Hexclave 5 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Python, Golang, Rust, Django while Hexclave leverages Next.js.

Authentik wins
Project Maturity

Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Authentik and Hexclave offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.