Learn how Authentik and Hexclave differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Authentik appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Authentik significantly outpaces Hexclave in community adoption with 22,456 stars compared to 6,838 stars on GitHub. This 3.3x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 1,712 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 5 hours ago and Hexclave 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authentik uses Python, Golang, Rust, Django while Hexclave leverages Next.js.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 2 years ago. This 4.2-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and Hexclave offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs