Learn how Authgear and Hexclave differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Authgear and Hexclave have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hexclave significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 6,838 stars compared to 1,912 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Hexclave has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hexclave has 521 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 11 hours ago and Hexclave 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python, Golang while Hexclave leverages Next.js.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 2 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM) while Hexclave extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authgear and Hexclave offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs