Hexclave significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 6,841 stars compared to 1,981 stars on GitHub. This 3.5x difference suggests Hexclave has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hexclave has 522 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Authgear is growing faster, adding 86 stars in the last 30 days (+4.5%) against adding 15 stars for Hexclave (+0.2%). Authgear is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 10 hours ago and Hexclave 7 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python, Golang while Hexclave leverages Next.js.

Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hexclave which began 2 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.

Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM) while Hexclave extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Both Authgear and Hexclave offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.