Learn how Authgear and Hanko differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Both Authgear and Hanko have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hanko significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 8,907 stars compared to 1,664 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests Hanko has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,010 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 12 hours ago and Hanko 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python while Hanko leverages Next.js, Vue.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authgear and Hanko offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.