Learn how Authgear and Hanko differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Authgear appears to have several advantages over Hanko, particularly in growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hanko significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 9,000 stars compared to 1,965 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Hanko has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hanko has 1,014 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Authgear is growing faster, adding 75 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 32 stars for Hanko (+0.4%). Authgear is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 5 days ago and Hanko 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Python while Hanko leverages Next.js, Vue.
Authgear has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Hanko which began 4 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Authgear may have more mature features and established processes.
Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Hanko's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authgear and Hanko offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository