Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.Learn how Authgear and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Both Authgear and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 15,251 stars compared to 1,949 stars on GitHub. This 7.8x difference suggests SuperTokens has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SuperTokens has 846 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 12 hours ago and SuperTokens 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Golang while SuperTokens leverages Java.
Both projects started around the same time, with Authgear beginning 6 years ago and SuperTokens 7 years ago.
Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authgear also focuses on Identity & Access Management (IAM).
Both Authgear and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Authgearvs
Better AuthActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Self-hosted
Repository
