Learn how Authgear and SuperTokens differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
22.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
authgear-server
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v12.4.1Self-hosted
YesRepository
supertokens-core
Both Authgear and SuperTokens have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SuperTokens significantly outpaces Authgear in community adoption with 15,339 stars compared to 2,137 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests SuperTokens has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SuperTokens has 788 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Authgear is growing faster, adding 51 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 11 stars for SuperTokens (+0.1%). Authgear is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authgear last updated 2 days ago and SuperTokens 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Authgear uses Golang while SuperTokens leverages Java.
Both projects started around the same time, with Authgear beginning 6 years ago and SuperTokens 7 years ago.
Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0, while SuperTokens's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO.
Both Authgear and SuperTokens offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs