Learn how Hexclave and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Pocket ID appears to have several advantages over Hexclave, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Hexclave having 6,841 stars and Pocket ID having 9,028 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Hexclave has 522 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 238 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 0 stars for Hexclave (0%). Pocket ID is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hexclave last updated 12 hours ago and Pocket ID 21 hours ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Hexclave beginning 2 years ago and Pocket ID 2 years ago.
Pocket ID is licensed under BSD-2-Clause, while Hexclave's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hexclave also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Hexclave and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs