Learn how Ory and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Ory and Pocket ID have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ory leads in popularity with 13,878 stars vs 9,192 stars for Pocket ID. The 51% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,185 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 360 stars in the last 30 days (+4.1%) against adding 50 stars for Ory (+0.4%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Pocket ID shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Ory was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Pocket ID is being more actively maintained.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 6.3-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Ory's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Ory and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs