Learn how Ory and Pocket ID differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Pocket ID appears to have several advantages over Ory, particularly in growth, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Ory having 13,907 stars and Pocket ID having 9,401 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,189 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Pocket ID is growing faster, adding 298 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 40 stars for Ory (+0.3%). Pocket ID is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Pocket ID shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while Ory was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Pocket ID is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Pocket ID leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, SvelteKit.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Pocket ID which began 2 years ago. This 6.3-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Pocket ID uses the BSD-2-Clause license, which is more permissive than Ory's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ory also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Ory and Pocket ID offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs