Ory vs Zitadel
Learn how Ory and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Learn how Ory and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Ory
Stars
13,593Forks
1,127Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
8 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Zitadel
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both Ory and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Ory and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both Ory and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 13,593 and 13,617 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Ory has 1,127 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Ory last updated 1 day ago and Zitadel 11 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SCSS, Lua.
Project Maturity
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Zitadel which began 6 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Ory and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Other tool comparisons to consider
Oryvs
HankoOryvs
Better AuthOryvs
KeycloakOryvs
AuthentikOryvs
SuperTokensOryvs
LogtoOryvs
Stack AuthOryvs
PermifyOryvs
CerbosOryvs
AuthgearOryvs
TesseralZitadelvs
HankoZitadelvs
Better AuthZitadelvs
KeycloakZitadelvs
AuthentikZitadelvs
SuperTokensZitadelvs
LogtoZitadelvs
Stack AuthZitadelvs
PermifyZitadelvs
CerbosZitadelvs
AuthgearZitadelvs
Tesseral
Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.