Learn how Ory and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.


Both Ory and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Ory and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 13,824 and 14,700 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,217 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zitadel is growing faster, adding 309 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 68 stars for Ory (+0.5%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ory last updated 13 days ago and Zitadel 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SCSS, Lua.
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Zitadel which began 6 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Both Ory and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository