Ory vs Zitadel
Learn how Ory and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Learn how Ory and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Ory
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 month agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v26.2.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
ory/kratos
Zitadel
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v4.17.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zitadel/zitadel
Detailed Comparison
Both Ory and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Ory and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both Ory and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 13,856 and 14,915 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,260 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Zitadel is growing faster, adding 305 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 52 stars for Ory (+0.4%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Zitadel shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Ory was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Zitadel is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, SCSS, Lua.
Project Maturity
Ory has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Zitadel which began 6 years ago. This 1.8-year head start suggests Ory may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
The projects use different licenses: Ory is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO, Authorization & Permissions.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Ory and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.