Learn how Logto and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v1.45.0License
MPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
logto-io/logto
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
v4.20.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
zitadel/zitadel
Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Logto, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logto and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 14,825 and 15,484 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,411 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zitadel is growing faster, adding 335 stars in the last 30 days (+2.2%) against adding 176 stars for Logto (+1.2%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 1 day ago and Zitadel 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages Next.js, Golang, Lua.
Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Logto and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs