Learn how Logto and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Logto and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Logto having 11,941 stars and Zitadel having 13,621 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,040 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 9 hours ago and Zitadel 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages Next.js, Golang, Lua.
Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Logto and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs