Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.Learn how Logto and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Both Logto and Zitadel have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logto and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 14,313 and 14,681 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,216 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 13 hours ago and Zitadel 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages Next.js, Golang, Lua.
Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Logto and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Logtovs
Better AuthActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
