Learn how Logto and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over Logto, particularly in growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Logto and Zitadel show comparable community engagement with 14,329 and 14,700 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,217 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zitadel is growing faster, adding 309 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 216 stars for Logto (+1.5%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Logto last updated 1 hour ago and Zitadel 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages Next.js, Golang, Lua.
Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Logto which began 5 years ago. This 1.3-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 while Zitadel uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.
Both Logto and Zitadel offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

vs
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository