What is the main difference between VoidAuth and Zitadel?

VoidAuth and Zitadel are both authentication & sso providers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: VoidAuth or Zitadel?

The choice between VoidAuth and Zitadel depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from VoidAuth to Zitadel?

Migration between VoidAuth and Zitadel is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

VoidAuth vs Zitadel

Learn how VoidAuth and Zitadel differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.

VoidAuth

Open-source single sign-on and user management for your self-hosted applications, with OIDC, ForwardAuth, LDAP and passkey support.

Visit VoidAuth Read more

2,923stars+38(+1.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.19.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
voidauth/voidauth

Zitadel

ZITADEL provides a comprehensive identity management solution with easy APIs, customizable workflows, and serverless deployment options.

Visit Zitadel Read more

15,587stars+260(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
7 years
Version
v4.20.3
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
zitadel/zitadel

Detailed Comparison

Zitadel appears to have several advantages over VoidAuth, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Zitadel wins

Community & Popularity

Zitadel significantly outpaces VoidAuth in community adoption with 15,587 stars compared to 2,923 stars on GitHub. This 5.3x difference suggests Zitadel has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zitadel has 1,430 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Zitadel wins

Growth Momentum

Zitadel is growing faster, adding 260 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 38 stars for VoidAuth (+1.3%). Zitadel is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with VoidAuth last updated 4 hours ago and Zitadel 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Zitadel leverages Bash, JSX, Next.js, Golang, Lua.

Zitadel wins

Project Maturity

Zitadel has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to VoidAuth which began 2 years ago. This 5.2-year head start suggests Zitadel may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zitadel extends into Authorization & Permissions.

Comparable