Learn how Authentik and VoidAuth differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these authentication & sso providers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v1.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
voidauth/voidauth
Authentik appears to have several advantages over VoidAuth, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Authentik significantly outpaces VoidAuth in community adoption with 26,101 stars compared to 2,892 stars on GitHub. This 9.0x difference suggests Authentik has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Authentik has 2,092 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
VoidAuth is growing faster, adding 49 stars in the last 30 days (+1.7%) against adding 368 stars for Authentik (+1.4%). VoidAuth is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Authentik last updated 7 hours ago and VoidAuth 12 hours ago.
Authentik has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to VoidAuth which began 2 years ago. This 5.4-year head start suggests Authentik may have more mature features and established processes.
Authentik uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than VoidAuth's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Authentication & SSO. However, they also have distinct specializations: Authentik also focuses on Authorization & Permissions.
Both Authentik and VoidAuth offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs